AUSTIN — Gov. Greg Abbott just lately signed a invoice bolstering reporting necessities for many who present abortions to minors, however critics say it and two different abortion measures will harm, not assist Texas women.
The discover invoice, which takes impact this fall, requires docs who carry out abortions on minors to report how the affected person obtained authorization.
“When abortions occur, especially on minors, Texas must do everything possible to protect these young mothers,” stated Abbott stated in a press release on House Bill 215. “Thanks to this law, we will now have more accurate data concerning abortions being performed on minors.”
Abbott additionally signed a regulation barring abortion protection beneath common insurance policy, leaving women to purchase separate insurance policies or to pay out of pocket; and one other, which supporters stated is designed to shut loopholes in reporting abortion problems.
While the insurance coverage and reporting payments — all have been handed throughout this summer time’s particular session — gained’t take impact till this fall, attorneys are getting ready to go into courtroom Tuesday to litigate an abortion regulation that got here out of the common session of the Legislature that pro-choice advocates say is a part of an ongoing try and make entry harder.
The regulation being challenged in courtroom subsequent week, Senate Bill eight, bans a standard second-trimester abortion process, and can primarily forbid abortion after 13 weeks as a result of various strategies might threaten women’s health.
The problem comes a few yr because the U.S. Supreme Court dominated towards Texas’ clinic-shutdown regulation in Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt.
The regulation, set to take impact on Sept. 1, additionally mandates cremation or burial of their embryonic and fetal tissue following abortion.
Seven different states have comparable bans.
Legal challenges have stored laws in Louisiana, Kansas and Oklahoma from taking impact.
Opponents have stopped an identical Alabama ban and are additionally difficult an Arkansas ban.
In defending the insurance coverage measure to fellow lawmakers, the principal writer of HB 214, state Rep. John Smithee, R-Amarillo, stated that “ultimately it’s economic objection to being forced to pay for something that I would prefer not to pay for.”
Abbott stated in a press release that the insurance coverage invoice would forestall Texans from having to pay for procedures that finish unborn lives.
“This bill prohibits insurance providers from forcing Texas policy holders to subsidize elective abortions,” Abbott stated. “I am grateful to the Texas legislature for … working to protect innocent life this special session.”
The regulation makes no exceptions for rape, incest or fetal abnormalities, and critics say that insurance coverage suppliers don�t sometimes promote supplemental abortion protection.
“It is creating a situation where most women have insurance when they need it and part of a ‘365-day-a-year’ effort to create barriers and “dismantle the safety net that women count on for health care and to plan and space pregnancies,” stated Sarah Wheat, chief exterior affairs officer for Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas.
State Rep. Donna Howard, D-Austin, opposed the trio of abortion laws that emerged from the particular session.
“It is quite telling that, of the 12 bills from the special session which were signed into law, three were measures designed to erode reproductive rights in Texas,” Howard stated in a press release. “These new laws do nothing to promote the health and safety of women, and were passed in spite of the objections and concerns of the medical community.”
Blake Rocap, legislative counsel for NARAL Pro-Choice Texas, a statewide reproductive rights advocacy company, stated that proponents of the just-enacted payments have been “looking for a bogeyman in the closet that’s just not there,” in passing the laws that addressed non-existent issues.
But Abbott stated in a press release on HB 13, the abortion-complication reporting measure, that “the health and safety of women is of the utmost importance, and we must have the most accurate data available in order to create good policy.”
John Austin covers the Texas Statehouse for CNHI’s newspapers and web sites. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org.