Wednesday , February 21 2018
Home / News / Here’s What The GOP Health Care Bill Would (And Wouldn’t) Change For Women : NPR

Here’s What The GOP Health Care Bill Would (And Wouldn’t) Change For Women : NPR

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., explains the Republican plan to switch the Affordable Care Act throughout his weekly press convention on the U.S. Capitol on Thursday.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

disguise caption

toggle caption

Win McNamee/Getty Images

Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wis., explains the Republican plan to exchange the Affordable Care Act throughout his weekly press convention on the U.S. Capitol on Thursday.

Win McNamee/Getty Images

The Affordable Care Act modified women’s health care in some massive methods: It stopped insurance coverage corporations from charging women additional, pressured insurers to cowl maternity care and contraceptives and allowed many women to get these contraceptives (in addition to quite a lot of preventive providers, like Pap smears and mammograms) at zero value.

Now Republicans have the chance to repeal that regulation, also called Obamacare. But that does not imply all these issues will go away. In reality, many will stay.

Confused? Here’s a rundown of how this invoice would change some women-specific areas of health care, what it would not change, and what we do not know to date.

What would change:

Abortion protection

There are restrictions on abortion under current law — the Hyde Amendment prohibits federal subsidies from being spent on abortions, besides within the case of pregnancies which are the results of rape or incest or that threaten the lifetime of the mom. So whereas health care plans can cowl abortions, these being paid for with subsidies “must follow particular administrative requirements to ensure that no federal funds go toward abortion,” because the Guttmacher Institute, which supports abortion rights, explains.

But the GOP invoice tightens this. It says that the tax credit on the middle of the plan can’t be spent in any respect on any health care plan that covers abortion (apart from the Hyde Amendment’s exceptions).

So whereas health care plans can cowl abortion, only a few individuals could possibly buy these types of plans, as they would not have the ability to use their tax credit on them. That might make it far more costly and troublesome to acquire an abortion underneath this regulation than underneath present regulation.

Planned Parenthood funding

This invoice partially “defunds” Planned Parenthood, which means it might reduce on the federal funding that can be utilized for providers on the clinics. Fully 43 percent of Planned Parenthood’s revenue in fiscal yr 2015 — greater than $550 million — got here from authorities grants and reimbursements.

Right now, underneath Obamacare, federal funds might be spent at Planned Parenthood, however they can not be used for abortion — once more, a results of the Hyde Amendment and once more, with the three Hyde Amendment exceptions. But this invoice goes additional, saying that folks could not use Medicaid at Planned Parenthood.

To be clear, it isn’t that there is a funding stream going immediately from the federal government to Planned Parenthood that Congress can simply flip off. Rather, this system reimburses Planned Parenthood for the care it supplies to Medicaid recipients. So this invoice would imply that Medicaid recipients who at present obtain care at a corporation that gives abortions must discover a new supplier (whom Medicaid would then reimburse).

Abortion is a small a part of what Planned Parenthood does: The organizations says it accounted for three.four % of all providers offered within the yr ending in September 2014. (Of course, some sufferers obtain multiple service; Planned Parenthood had round 2.5 million sufferers in that yr. Assuming one abortion per affected person, that is roughly 13 % of all sufferers receiving abortions.)

Together, offering contraception and the testing for and remedy of sexually transmitted illnesses made up three-quarters of the providers the group offered in a single yr.

That means low-income women (that’s, women on Medicaid) might be among the many most closely affected by this invoice, as it might drive them to seek out different suppliers for reproductive health providers.

Of the opposite authorities cash that goes to Planned Parenthood, most of it comes from Title X. That federal program, created underneath President Richard Nixon, supplies household planning providers to individuals past Medicaid, like low-income women who are usually not Medicaid-eligible. Earlier this yr, Republicans started the process of stripping that funding.

What would not change (but):

Republicans have burdened that this invoice was simply one in every of three elements, so it is arduous to say definitively what would not change in any respect because of their plan. But to date, this is what’s holding regular:

Maternity and contraceptive protection

Because this was a reconciliation invoice, it might cowl fiscal-related subjects solely. It could not get into most of the particulars of what individuals’s protection will seem like, which means some issues will not change.

The important health advantages set out in Obamacare — an inventory of 10 forms of providers that each one plans should cowl — don’t change for different insurance policies. Maternity care is included in these advantages, as is contraception, so plans should proceed to cowl these. The GOP invoice additionally does not change the Obamacare coverage that gave women entry to free contraception, as Vox’s Emily Crockett reported.

In addition, maternity and contraception are nonetheless each “mandatory benefits” beneath Medicaid. That does not change within the GOP invoice. (Confusingly, the invoice does sundown important health advantages for Medicaid recipients. But as a result of there’s overlap and these specific advantages stay “mandatory,” they are not going away.)

However, all of this would possibly not essentially stay unchanged. In response to a question about defunding Planned Parenthood this week, Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price stated that he did not need to “violate anybody’s conscience.” When a reporter requested how this pertains to contraception, Price didn’t give a particular reply.

“We’re working through all of those issues,” he stated. “As you know, many of those were through the rule-making process, and we’re working through that. So that’s not a part of this piece of legislation right here.”

So that is one thing that would simply change within the second “phase” of the health care plan, when guidelines are modified.

“Preventative services [the category that includes contraception] hasn’t been touched, but we expect those to be touched probably via regulation,” stated Laurie Sobel, affiliate director for women’s health coverage on the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The finish of gender score

Prior to Obamacare, women have been typically charged extra for a similar health plans as males. The rationale was that women tend to use more health care providers than males.

However, Obamacare banned the follow, and that ban appears unlikely to vary, because the GOP cites nondiscrimination as one of the bill’s selling points:

“Our proposal specifically prohibits any gender discrimination. Women will have equal access to the same affordable, quality health care options as men do under our proposal.”

Source link

Check Also

Women 2 Women health conference March 3

Janet Anderson created Women 2 Women three years in the past so native women might …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *